An eminent psychologist gives a major fresh theory of human cognition: motion, not language, is the foundation of thought

When we make an effort to consider how we think, we can not help but think about words. Certainly, some have known as language the stuff of believed. But images are remembered far better than words, and describing faces, scenes, and events defies words. Anytime you have a shortcut or play chess or basketball or rearrange your home furniture in your mind, you’ve done something extraordinary: about Mind in Motion: How Actions Shapes Thought abstract considering without words.

In Mind in Motion, psychologist Barbara Tversky implies that spatial cognition is not only a peripheral facet of thought, but its very foundation, enabling us to pull meaning from our bodies and their actions in the world. Our activities in genuine space get converted into mental activities on thought, frequently spouting spontaneously from our bodies as gestures. Spatial thinking underlies creating and using maps, assembling home furniture, devising football strategies, designing airports, understanding the circulation of people, visitors, water, and suggestions. Spatial thinking actually underlies the framework and meaning of vocabulary: why we state we push suggestions forward or tear them aside, why we’re sense up or have grown far apart.

Like Thinking, Fast and Slow before it, Brain in Motion gives us a fresh way to think about how–and where–thinking takes place.